Ogun APC Denies Factionalisation, Claims of Camps, Caucus Amid Rumoured Internal Crisis
The All Progressives Congress (APC) in Ogun State has firmly rejected claims of internal factionalisation, insisting that the party remains a unified political structure despite growing narratives of caucus dominance and camp politics within its ranks.
The party maintained that what is often described in public discourse as “camps” or “power blocs” are largely misinterpretations of internal consultations and leadership engagement, rather than evidence of division.
This position was made clear during an appearance on Frontline, a current affairs programme on Eagle 102.5 FM, Ilese-Ijebu, where the State Publicity Secretary, Olufemi Nuberu, addressed a range of concerns bordering on unity, internal discipline, and recent political tensions within the Ogun APC.
This comes at a time when political activities ahead of the 2026 elections have intensified, with increased scrutiny on the internal dynamics of the ruling party in the state.
In recent weeks, political discussions across Ogun State have been dominated by reports suggesting the emergence of parallel interests within the APC, particularly within Ogun East Senatorial District.
These reports were further fuelled by controversies surrounding a political meeting held at Adeola Odutola Hall in Ijebu-Ode, where allegations emerged that certain prominent figures were either excluded or restricted from participation. Among those referenced in public discourse is former Governor and current Senator representing Ogun East, Otunba Gbenga Daniel, whose alleged experience at the meeting became a subject of widespread debate.
The situation has since raised broader questions about inclusivity, internal democracy, and the balance of power within the party.
However, Nuberu dismissed the narratives as exaggerated and lacking factual basis, insisting that the APC does not operate through parallel structures or competing factions. He argued that the party’s organisational framework is clearly defined, with established leadership at all levels, leaving no room for unofficial or duplicative authority systems.
According to him, the idea of multiple caucuses exercising independent control is inconsistent with the constitutional structure of the APC. He maintained that while consultations may occur among stakeholders, they do not translate into factional divisions.
“There is no caucus in APC in the way people are trying to present it in the public space, and I think that is where a lot of the confusion is coming from. APC is one in Ogun State, and the structure of the party is clearly defined from the ward level to the state level, with recognised leadership at every point. We do not have two Ogun East senatorial chairmen, we do not have two youth leaders, and we certainly do not operate two parallel party systems within the same state. What we have is one party, one structure, and one leadership, and when that leadership speaks through its organs, it is binding on all members.”
He stressed that the use of terms such as “camp” and “caucus” in political commentary often reflects informal alignments rather than formal divisions within the party. According to him, political actors may naturally gravitate towards individuals or tendencies, but such alignments do not override the authority of the party’s official organs.
He insisted that the APC remains institutionally intact and continues to function under a single command structure.
Addressing the controversy surrounding the Ijebu-Ode meeting, Nuberu questioned the credibility of reports suggesting exclusion of certain party leaders, noting that much of the narrative has been driven by unverified social media content.
He argued that in an era of digital manipulation, political organisations must rely on verifiable information rather than viral claims. According to him, the APC has not received any formal complaint indicating that any member was unjustly denied access to a party function.
“A good judge does not act on hearsay, and that is the principle we also apply in party administration, because decisions must be based on facts and not on speculation or social media narratives. Especially in a time like this when technology has advanced to the point where videos and images can be manipulated, we must be very careful about what we accept as evidence. As far as the party is concerned, there has been no official report submitted to indicate that any individual was denied his constitutional right to attend a meeting. And until such a report exists within the party structure, we cannot act on assumptions.”
He further emphasized that the APC operates a formal complaint system through which grievances are expected to be channeled, rather than resolved in the public space. According to him, internal disputes, if any, must be addressed through party mechanisms to ensure fairness and proper documentation.
He warned that public speculation without formal reporting could distort the true picture of events within the party.
The issue of internal discipline also surfaced during the interview, particularly regarding the status of members who were previously reported to have been suspended by party structures.
Nuberu clarified that such matters remain under the jurisdiction of the national leadership, which has already intervened to stabilize the situation. He explained that the party is currently operating under a directive that maintains the existing status pending final resolution of all disciplinary issues.
“Those who have been mentioned in the context of suspension are still within the framework of what I would describe as a ‘suspended suspension,’ because the national body of the party has already spoken on the matter and directed that status quo should be maintained. What that means is that no final decision has been taken that removes anyone completely from the party at this stage.
These processes take time, and they must be handled carefully to ensure that justice is done within the party system. So it is important for people to understand that the matter is still being managed at a higher level.”
He explained that suspension within party politics does not automatically translate to expulsion, noting that due process must be followed before any definitive action is taken. According to him, affected members remain part of the party until all internal mechanisms have been exhausted and a final decision is reached. This clarification, he said, is necessary to prevent misinterpretation of disciplinary actions within the APC.
The programme also featured contributions from callers, some of whom expressed concern about what they described as emerging dominance of certain political tendencies within the party.
One caller argued that even without formal factions, influence within the party appears concentrated among a few powerful individuals, raising questions about inclusivity and fairness. The caller suggested that political reality often differs from official explanations, particularly in how decisions are made behind closed doors.
“Even if we say there are no factions officially, the reality many of us are seeing is that certain individuals or groups seem to have more influence than others, and that naturally creates the impression of camps. People are not just reacting based on rumours; they are reacting based on patterns they have observed over time. So the concern is whether everyone truly has equal access and opportunity within the party structure. That is what people want clarity on.”
Another caller, however, defended the party’s position, arguing that political organisations naturally have leaders whose influence shapes direction without necessarily creating division. The caller maintained that unity does not mean absence of influence, but rather the ability of the party to operate under a common structure despite differing opinions.
“Every political party in the world has leaders whose voices carry more weight, and that does not automatically mean there is division or faction within the system. What matters is whether the party can still function as one unit and present a common front during elections. From what has been explained, it seems the APC is still operating under one structure, even if there are internal consultations happening. So I think we should be careful not to confuse influence with division.”
Responding to these concerns, Nuberu reiterated that influence within a political party does not equate to factionalisation, as long as all actions are ultimately subject to the authority of the party’s recognised organs.
He emphasized that leadership and consultation are natural elements of political organisation, but they must operate within constitutional boundaries. According to him, the APC in Ogun State remains firmly under a unified structure that guides all decisions and activities.
“Influence is a natural part of politics, and it exists in every political system, but it must always operate within the framework of the party’s constitution and recognised leadership structure. What we do not have in APC is a situation where different groups are running parallel systems or issuing conflicting directives, because that would amount to factionalisation. What we have is consultation, engagement, and leadership, all working within one structure. And as long as that structure remains intact, the party remains one.”
As political activities continue to build ahead of the 2026 elections, the APC maintains that its internal processes remain stable and constitutionally guided, despite growing public scrutiny. The party insists that its strength lies in its ability to manage internal differences without descending into fragmentation, while maintaining a unified front.
According to Nuberu, the APC’s structure is designed to absorb internal disagreements and resolve them through established mechanisms rather than allowing them to escalate into crises.
He concluded by reaffirming that the party remains committed to unity, discipline, and constitutional order as it prepares for the next electoral cycle.
He urged members and the public to rely on verified information and official communication rather than speculation, emphasizing that the integrity of the party’s structure must not be undermined by unfounded narratives. According to him, the APC in Ogun State remains one indivisible entity, regardless of the political conversations surrounding it.
You can get every of our news as soon as they drop on WhatsApp ...To get all news updates, Join our WhatsApp Group (Click Here)
